Is It My Cold Or Is This Odd?

Blogged in General by Gloria Salt Monday February 27, 2006

The following sentence is from an article on today’s Yahoo News about Jill Carroll, the journalist for Christian Science Monitor who was kidnapped by terrorists in Iraq:

“The Bush administration, Hamas, the Committee to Protect Journalists and the student newspaper at the University of Massachusetts have called for Carroll’s release.”

Is that an incredibly peculiar lineup or what?

Between that kind of headspinning weirdness and Iran contending with a straight face that Tom & Jerry are a fiendish Zionist plot (which would probably surprise world-class anti-Semite Walt Disney), I’m starting to get that sense again that we’ve slipped into a crazy parallel universe. Maybe things will look a little less nutty after some camomile tea…

What Terrorism Means

Blogged in General,Islamofascism by Gloria Salt Tuesday February 21, 2006

The invaluable Norm Geras has posted a piece on the Third International Congress of Terror Victims, which was held on February 13 in Valencia, Spain. The Congress is a gathering of survivors and family members of victims of terror attacks across the globe, including, among many others, the 9/11 assault on the US, the 2004 Beslan elementary school massacre, and the 2005 London transit bombings. In view of the extraordinary deference being shown to those coreligionists of the terrorists who are taking the Danish cartoon controversy as an opportunity to openly espouse mass murder (and, indeed, to commit murder), an event like this warrants more publicity, to say the least.

On opening day, a powerful speech was made by Israeli Arnold Roth, whose 15-year-old daughter Malki was murdered by Palestinian terrorists in the Sbarro restaurant bombing in Jerusalem on August 9, 2001. Roth makes many points worth reading — about the terrible human need for explanation that can impel one to find rationality where there is none, about the complete inability of the United Nations ever to take the side of the victims, about the fatal lack of clarity in the news media about the very meaning of the word “terrorism”. The following are excerpts:

…it is not beautiful to be a victim of terror. It is not romantic. It is not transcendental and it is not heroic. It is not like the movies. It is a nightmare and the deepest, most painful tragedy that most people will ever experience in their lives…

This process of becoming a victim makes very little sense to those of us who have experienced it. But the societies in which we live seek to understand terror. They try to get to the bottom of the anger and the hatred which animate terror by looking for root causes that explain it, that rationalize it. We have seen this done by journalists, by politicians, by community leaders, by our own neighbors…

A committee of the United Nations has been trying for the past nine years to write a convention against terrorism. For ordinary people like us, this does not sound like the most difficult thing for lawyers and diplomats to do. We know that terrorism means the deliberate targeting of civilians for injury and death. But there is an international association of states – I will not name it – comprising some 57 countries, nearly 30% of the 191 member states of the United Nations. For nine years, this association has frustrated the writing of the United Nations anti-terror convention by insisting that terrorism must be defined not by the nature of the act but by its purpose

Their definition is not at all interested in how barbaric that act may be. Or how random. Or how defenseless and innocent the victims.

I am neither a diplomat nor a politician. But I have consulted with some academic experts and it is clear to me what this means. It means that terrorism when it is done for a bad cause is bad. Terrorism when it is done for a good cause is good. An individual citizen, a diplomat, a journalist or a country which holds to this view is not against terrorism at all but simply opposed to bad causes.

The effect of this regimented attention to semantics is that in its entire history the United Nations has failed time and time again to express an unequivocal condemnation of terrorism…

To dismiss this depressing chain of events by calling it a difference of opinion over definitions is to miss the point. There is an actual, practical life-and-death question here which we, assembled here in this hall, are uniquely placed to answer: Is it ever legitimate to target women, children and other noncombatants? For nations comprising some 30 per cent of the United Nations, the answer – tragically, astonishingly – is yes.

Some of the men and women who murdered my child are in prison in Israel. Others are alive and well and free and active. Some of them have even become newly-elected members of parliament – not the parliament of my country but the parliament of the neighbour with whom we desperately want to live in peace.

Since the death of my daughter Malki, I read [newspapers] carefully and I pay close attention to the words [journalists] use. You may have noticed that the media seldom use the word “terrorist”. Instead, the men and women who kill innocent civilians in restaurants, who place bombs on train carriages and buses, who stab and beat children in kindergartens and playgrounds – these are called fighters, activists, protesters, militants, insurgents, anything except what they actually are: murderers, terrorists, barbarians.

I believe that this avoidance of plain and clear language happens because journalists, editors and publishers are unsure, themselves, of what terrorism is. They need to hear our voices. They need to understand – to really understand – that terrorism is not some kind of romantic struggle for dignity. It is not a noble alternative form of warfare. It is the purest, most physical expression of hatred and intolerance. [emphases added.]

Roth concludes by citing a line that appears in the Jewish Talmud:

“He who is compassionate to the cruel will ultimately become cruel to the compassionate”.

?? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ?????? ???????

Read the whole thing.

Pass the Saucer

Blogged in General by Gloria Salt Sunday January 15, 2006

Constituents of British Member of Parliament and world-class suck-up to dictators George Galloway, who mysteriously won the hearts of his Muslim fanbase by emphatically objecting to the liberation of a whole nation of Muslims from a genocidal maniac, are finally starting to wonder whether they might have voted for an ass.

Why? Because he impersonated a cat on a dopey TV reality show.

The Respect Party MP, who last year lambasted the United States Senate over the war in Iraq, crouched on all fours, purring and licking imaginary milk from the hands of the actress Rula Lenska.

She then rubbed the “cream” from his “whiskers” and stroked his head and behind his ears before he put his head on her lap.

Mr Galloway, 51, faced an immediate backlash from residents of his Bethnal Green and Bow constituency, east London, who voted for him last May.

Monir Ali, a 50-year-old tailor and a constituent of Galloway’s, said, “I think a lot of people are regretting voting for him”. Hmm. Advocating on behalf of one of the worst mass-murderers of Muslims in history — no problem! Impersonating a cat on national television — disgraceful!

Of course, it might have been Galloway’s additional remark, later in the program, that his favorite pursuits are “sex and sunbathing.”

Whatever. May the well-deserved humiliation continue.

UPDATE: Nick Cohen serves up a magnificently scathing post-mortem on the Galloway fiasco in the Guardian:

Was it Galloway’s support for every anti-American tyrant on the planet that did for him? Not at all. He could salute the ‘courage, strength and indefatigability’ of Saddam Hussein, Tariq Aziz and Bashar al-Assad with impunity. How about his apologetics for the ‘martyrs’ of al-Qaeda and the Baath Party who represent everything the liberal-left has been against since the Enlightenment? No, not at all, that was fine, too. Or perhaps his sickening attacks on ‘quisling’ Iraqi trade unionists when they were being murdered by those same al-Qaeda and Baathist terrorists?

The liberal media have turned on Galloway because of a far more heinous crime: his appearance on Celebrity Big Brother. The Independent and the BBC are furious that Galloway is failing to represent his constituents while he is in the Big Brother house. Why they believe an operator who saluted Saddam and described the fall of the Soviet Union as ‘the worst day of my life’ should want to observe the niceties of parliamentary democracy is beyond me. He was hardly ever in the Commons when he wasn’t on Big Brother.

(Via Norm.)

Jewish and Israeli Blog Awards — And the Voting Begins!

Blogged in General by Gloria Salt Monday January 9, 2006

Voting starts today for the second annual Jewish and Israeli Blog Awards, sponsored by Israellycool and the Jerusalem Post. This is the preliminary round, which will determine the finalists. There will be another round of voting to decide who wins among the finalists in the various categories.

If you go to the Post’s award site, you’ll find a cornucopia of blogs to explore. It’s a great opportunity to discover some blogs you might really enjoy. You can see all the nominations on a single page and settle in for some good reading.

I’m happy to say this blog has been nominated in four categories: Best Overall Blog, Best New Blog of 2005, Best Politics and Current Affairs Blog, and Best Post. Browse the contenders and cast your votes today!

Piazza in Twilight: An Appreciation

Blogged in Baseball,General,Personal by Gloria Salt Wednesday September 28, 2005

Fair warning, everybody: this post has nothing to do with Israel. It has to do with baseball, and with one player in particular.

Today’s NY Times features a thoughtful piece on the decline of two fine ballplayers: Bernie Williams, center fielder for the NY Yankees, and Mike Piazza, catcher for the NY Mets. My natural aversion to all things Yankee precludes me from waxing lyrical about Williams, although I do admit to a quiet appreciation of his spectacles-sporting, classical-guitar-playing style, which goes pleasingly against the grain of your typical major-league ballplayer. No, this post is about Mike Piazza: the man who singlehandedly revitalized the NY Mets right around the time I left my beloved New York City for Israel.

Picture this. You’re in the batter’s box at Shea with a full count, two men on and two outs. The pitch is in the air. You can see from the moment it leaves the pitcher’s glove that it’s low and way outside. In the few seconds the ball takes to reach you, your body decides not to go for the walk. You lean forward at the waist and stretch your arms out. To make contact with the ball, your hands must actually separate, so that at the moment the bat strikes, it is being swung by only your left hand. You instinctively flick your left wrist. This ball, which in the hands of a normal mortal would be a sad little dribbler that barely makes it out of the infield, explodes off your bat and down the first base line for an extra-base hit and two RBIs.

Thus were the physics-defying spectacles to which we Mets fans were regularly treated by Piazza, that marquee combination of brawn, brains and bod, in those heady early days when he first came to town and on into the days of glory – the trip to the World Series, the unprecedented hitting numbers, the surpassing of Carlton Fisk’s record for most home runs by a catcher. Piazza parlayed a modest assortment of natural talents into a full-throttle legend by never, ever taking no for an answer. Michael Joseph Piazza is a walking testament to the sheer power of will.

It would be difficult to find another future Hall of Famer whose provenance is more underwhelming. He had a tepid, abbreviated college career in which his hitting prowess was evident but his slowness a constant liability. His professional prospects seemed dim to hopeless by the 62nd round of the 1988 major league draft. Indeed, Piazza would almost certainly now be just a regular Joe had he not gotten a major break at that moment: Family friend Tommy LaSorda stepped in to urge the Los Angeles Dodgers to give Piazza a shot. He was reluctantly picked up late in that round, with the Dodgers so skeptical about him that they wouldn’t pay his plane fare to L.A.

Piazza took this phenomenal piece of luck not as an end in itself, as many other well-connected, moderately talented young men would have done, but as a chance to drive himself with the utmost seriousness toward greatness. Piazza hurled himself into the project of professional ball with the same single-minded determination that had led him to spend winters shoveling snow out of the makeshift batting cage his father built for him in his Pennsylvania backyard. Partly to justify LaSorda’s faith in him and partly to counter constant accusations that he’d been given a free ride, Piazza did everything imaginable to mold himself into a major-leaguer. He went total immersion, becoming the first U.S. player to attend the Campo Las Palmas baseball academy in the Dominican Republic, and put himself on a course of relentless weight-training and batting practice. At the very beginning of his career, Piazza didn’t even qualify for flash-in-the-pan status. But his work ethic led him to eleven seasons as an All-Star, batting numbers that are practically unheard of for a catcher, and a facility for the clutch home run that had Mets owners Doubleday and Wilpon turning cartwheels and then-GM Steve Phillips looking like a genius.

Piazza had the pluck to stick it out in New York, not in spite of the ferociousness of the impatient New York fans but because of it. And he was rewarded, after a year of snippy phenom-baiting, by an outpouring of adoration from fans of both genders and respect from the press: for the most part, journalists exhibited a remarkable lack of prurient interest in his guarded social life, and he was even given a pass on his intermittently disastrous facial hair. That warmth may reflect the fact that he has always been not only available but articulate: he employs more polysyllabic words, more complete sentences, and fewer references to the Almighty in his interviews than just about any active player in the bigs.

And then, of course, there’s the hottie factor. With all due respect to Derek Jeter fans, this is no aw-shucks, pretty-pretty teen fantasy we’re talking about. And it wasn’t just bridge-and-tunnel babes with astrological decals on their fingernails and black lipliner who felt the Mike Effect in those early days. More than one glasses-wearing, mousse-free New York girl found herself growing thoughtful at the spectacle of all that luscious, coiled-up power, to say nothing of the suburban moms who suddenly, in a flash of insight, saw the appeal of major league baseball. When the trade was sealed and delivered in May 1998, there was much sober yakking among commentators about the power of Mike’s long ball to put tushes on seats at Shea. True, of course. But it was straight-talking New York relief pitcher John Franco who added the obvious: “He’s single.”

Professional sports engage us because they provide a legitimate flight of fantasy into which we can happily fling ourselves. They give us a bridge to an earlier time in our lives when superhuman feats – or even proximity to superhuman feats – seemed a perfectly reasonable expectation. It is a warm, delicious feeling to be returned to that state, even if only for an afternoon. But you can’t be escorted there by whining, churlish, mean-spirited, joyless creeps, as professional athletes increasingly are. Good-looking, hard-hitting, enigmatic Mike Piazza fascinates because he represents the righteous, all-American value of hard work – but also because he is just sexy enough to plug into our less righteous, equally American lust for celebrity. You are a warrior, Mike, and an honorable man. You’ve done us Mets fans proud. May your steps down from the pedestal be easy.

See you in Cooperstown.

Well, It’s a Step Up from a Suicide Belt

Blogged in General by Gloria Salt Sunday September 25, 2005

Palestinian schoolchildren are being used, unwittingly, as pint-sized drug smugglers to shuttle illegal substances between Egypt and the Gaza Strip.

Presumably Hamas will deal with this when they get elected in Gaza.

Schoolyard Logic

Blogged in General by Gloria Salt Tuesday September 20, 2005

I’m back! Tanned (for me), rested, and newly obsessed with an obscure sport (see below). I did not read a newspaper, watch a TV news report or listen to a radio the whole time I was away, and I’m taking reentry nice and slow.

A quick look at the headlines indicates that the biggest story around these parts during the past week was the tediously predictable torching by Palestinians of synagogues in Gaza vacated by the Israelis. Honestly, people. Why not shake things up a little by defying expectations? Confuse us!

One irksome note in the synagogue-torching orgy was the casual reference, swallowed whole by an unquestioning British journalist (now there’s a surprise!), that it was simply payback for Israeli destruction of mosques during the occupation (“The Israelis destroyed our homes and our mosques. Today it is our turn to destroy theirs,” said one man in Netzarim, who was hitting the building with a large hammer”). Quick fact check: IDF policy is widely known by the Palestinians themselves (if not by foreign journalists) to be respectful of holy places, so much so that they have exploited that sensitivity time and time again to gain advantage over Israeli soldiers. Presumably the UK Times reporter had never heard of the Nablus casbah, where terrorists used mosques as safe bases from which to shoot at Israeli soldiers in 2002, or the siege of Bethlehem (also 2002), during which terrorists holed themselves up in the Church of the Nativity, secure in the knowledge that the IDF would not storm it to get them out.

But anyway. About that sport. I spent the week on the gorgeous Turkish coast shooting a bow and arrow about four hours a day. There’s an enormously appealing zen quality to archery, I discovered: the quiet, the repetition, the focus, the stillness. Even the soft sounds are satisfying. I loved it, so much so that on my return, I immediately started checking out archery in Israel in the hope that there’s somewhere nearby where I can keep up target practice. All I’ve been able to locate so far is a range in Rishon, which unfortunately is too far from my home to be practicable (if any of you know of a range closer to the center, please let me know).

I did uncover a sad little story involving Israelis, archery, and Muslim anti-Semitism. In July 1995, the 38th World Outdoor Archery Championship was held in Jakarta, Indonesia. The Indonesian government summarily decided that the Israeli team (which consisted of a single archer and two coaches) would be barred from the competition unless they agreed to identify themselves as “Group A” (Group A?) rather than “Israel” and to fly the International Archery Federation’s flag instead of the Israeli flag. This ex cathedra pronouncement produced a flurry of indignation from the Anti-Defamation League and even a condemnation on the floor of the US House of Representatives. None of this helped the poor Israeli archer, though, who had little choice but to withdraw from the competition and fly home.

There’s something about that particular strain of anti-Semitism – the “If I shut my eyes really tight and pretend really hard that you’re not there, you won’t be!” variety – that makes me want to shake people. Grow up! It’s as if we never left the schoolyard. Remember cooties? We’ve got ‘em, apparently, and you’re scared of ‘em. Hate to break it to you, but we’re not going anywhere. So let’s cut the crap, shall we?

Somebody find me an archery coach. My blood is up.

See You In a Week!

Blogged in General by Gloria Salt Friday September 9, 2005

I’m off with the family for a week’s vacation. I plan to attempt a non-tomato-like suntan, a tennis lesson or three and the completion of at least two more Ngaio Marshes. I’ll be back to blogging as soon as I return.

Apropos of nothing (to coin a phrase), have any of you ever baked and iced a spherical cake? All hints eagerly sought! (I have an excellent reason for asking this question, but you’ll have to pop back in a week to find out what it is…)

Two Quick Items

Blogged in Foreign Relations,General by Gloria Salt Thursday September 1, 2005

Family is visiting from abroad so I’m unable to write about either of these items at length, but they leaped out of the headlines today. They can be filed under two categories: Encouraging and Terrifying.

Encouraging: There was an unprecedented public meeting today between the foreign ministers of Israel and Pakistan. Pakistan was full of caveats and qualifications, but this is nevertheless an extremely positive development. Silvan Shalom is jumping out of his socks, and rightly so.

Terrifying: Of the many threats we hear around these parts, the threat – just reiterated – to kidnap soldiers is perhaps the most horrific. (Or perhaps it’s the most horrific if you’re the parent of an Israeli child.) The very thought of this idea — and the way our enemies refer to it as a “policy”, as though it’s perfectly legitimate — renders me quite incandescent with rage.

Help the Hurricane Victims

Blogged in General by Gloria Salt Wednesday August 31, 2005

Courtesy of Glenn Reynolds, here is a list of charities through which you can send assistance to the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

  • Apropos Of Nothing is featured at Punditdrome
  • 27 queries. 0.144 seconds.
    Powered by Wordpress
    theme by evil.bert